PENERAPAN STRATEGI PICTURE WORD INDUCTIVE MODEL GUNA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR DALAM MENYUSUN TEKS DESKRIPTIF BERBAHASA INGGRIS BAGI SISWA KELAS VII/A SMP NEGERI 3 PRAYA TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015
Abstract
PTK dengan 3 siklus dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui efektifitas penerapan media Picture Word Inductive Model dalam pembelajaran menulis deskriptife terhadap siswa kelas VII/a SMPN 3 Praya tahun 2014/2015, metode pengumpulan data secara triangulasi: Observasi, interview, dan dokumentasi.Hasilnya, siklus pertama 15 siswa (39,47%) yang bisa mendiskripsikan benda tertentu dengan benar. Pada siklus 25 siswa (65,79%) yang berhasil mendiskripsikan orang tertentu dengan benar. Pada siklus ke tiga, 20 siswa (52,63 %) yang berhasil belajar aktif. Disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran menulis berbahasa Inggris menggunakan media Picture Word Inductive Model dapat meningkatkan ketrampilan siwa kelas VII/a SMPN 3 Praya tahun 2014/2015 dalam mendiskripsikan benda/orang/tempat tertentu.
Abstract: PTK with 3 cycles implemented to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of media Picture Word Inductive Model in learning descriptive writing to students of class VII / a SMPN 3 Praya year 2014/2015, data collection methods in triangulation: Observation, interview, and documentation. students (39.47%) who can describe certain objects correctly. In cycle 25 students (65,79%) who successfully describe certain person correctly. In the third cycle, 20 students (52.63%) were successful in active learning. It was concluded that English speaking learning using Picture Word Inductive Model can improve the skill of class VII / a student of SMPN 3 Praya in 2014/2015 in describing certain object / person / place.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming Critical: education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer.
Cohen, L ; Manion, L & Morrison, K (2000) Research Methods in Education (5th edition). London,:Routledge Falmer.
Corey, S. (1953) Action Research to Improve School Practices. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research 2nd Development.In
M. Huberman, & J. M. Backus (Eds.), Advances in Development. London: Heinemann.
Dep.dik.nas, (2003) Kurikulum 2004, Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta.
Ebbutt, D. (1985) Educational Action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles, in: Burgess, R. (ed.) Issues in Educational Research: qualitative methods. Lewes: Falmer.
Elliott, J. (1981) Action research: a framework for self-evaluation in schools. TIQL working paper no.1. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.
(1991) Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fischer, J. (2001). Action Research Rationale and Planning: Developing a Framework for Teacher Inquiry. In G. Burnaford, J. Fischer & D.
Fueyo, V. & Koorland, M. A. (1997). Teacher as researcher: A synonym for professionalism. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 336-338.
Gibson, R. (1985) Critical times for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 15 (1): 59-64.
Hammond, J., et. al.. (1992). English for Social Purposes: a Handbook for teachers of Adult Literacy. Sydney: NCELTER.
Harmer, J. 1998. How to Teach English. England: Longman.
Hollingsworth, S. (ed.) (1997) International Action Research: a casebook for educational reform. London: Falmer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v12i11.102
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
____________________________________________
MEDIA BINA ILMIAH
ISSN 1978-3787 (print) | 2615-3505( online)
Published by BINA PATRIA | Email: laloemipa@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats