PERANAN PERMA NO. 1 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG PEDOMAN PEMIDANAAN PASAL 2 DAN PASAL 3 UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM RANGKA MENANGGULANGI DISPARITAS PEMIDANAAN

Yuli Indarsih

Abstract


The Supreme Court has enacted its Regulation Number 1 Year 2020 regarding the Sentencing Guidelines on Articles 2 and 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law (PERMA No.1/2020), in which, one of its objectives is to avoid or overcome the disparity of sentencing problemcaused by orimposed throughthe court’s decisions, particularly, in corruption cases having similar characters. PERMA No.1/2020 constitutes the new law development in connection with the sentencing guidelines, and directly affects the twomain sourcesof sentencing disparity problems, i.e.the law/regulation and judge factors. Therefore,this PERMA No.1/2020 has two main important roles. Firstly,it provides the interpretation and improvement on the formulation of articles 2 and 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law, by stipulating and quantifying, among others,  the category of state loss along with state economic loss, andthe scale of the minimum and maximum sentence elements as determined in those articles. Secondly, it provides the judges with the guidelines which have to be applied by them in the court proceedings, and this regulation will not be contrary with their independency.Furthermore, it is expected that this PERMA No.1/2020 will beableto support and achieve the equal treatment for the offenders, uniformity of judge’s opinion, as well as, the uniforminity in the implementation of laws andconsistency of the court verdicts in connection with the law enforment processes as a whole.


Keywords


Perma, Corruption & Disparity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrachman, Hamidah, Rahmad Agung Nugraha dan Nayla Majestya. 2020. Palu Hakim Versus Rasa Keadilan Sebuah Pengantar Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish.

Ardiansyah, Irfan. 2017. Disparitas Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Penyebab Dan Penanggulangannya). Pekanbaru: Penerbit Hawa dan Ahwa.

Carmen, Rolando V. del dan Craig Hemmens. 2017. Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. Boston: Cencage Learning.

Dahlan. 2017. Problematika Keadilan dalam Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Penyalah Guna Narkotika. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish.

Fatmawati, Irma. 2020. Hukum Yayasan Pendidikan Prinsip Transparansi Pengelolaan Kegiatan Usaha Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2004. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish.

Fauzan, H.M dan. Baharuddin Siagian. 2017. Kamus Hukum dan Yurisprudensi. Depok: Kencana.

Fuady, Munir. 2003. Aliran Hukum Kritis (Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Heidenheimer Arnold J. dan Michael Johnston (Ed). 2002.Political Corruption Concepts and Contexts.New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Huda, Chairul. 2011. “Dari 'Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan', Menuju 'Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan: Tinjauan kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana”. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Kansil, C.S.T. 1989. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. 2018.Meluruskan Arah Manajemen Kekuasaan Kehakiman.Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar dan Arief Sidharta, 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, Bandung.

Lamintang, P.A.F. 1984. Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Armico.

Langkun, Tama S, Bahrain, Mouna Wassef, Tri Wahyu dan Asram. 2014. Studi atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta:Indonesia Corruption Watch.

Lopa, Baharuddin dan Moh Yamin. 1987.Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 1971) Berikut Pembahasan serta Penerapannya Dalam Praktek. Bandung:Alumni.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi A. 1992. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Munir Fuady. 2003. Aliran Hukum Kritis (Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Panggabean, H.P. 2020. Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Teori - Praktik dan Yurisprudensi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Prodjohamodjojo, Martiman. 1984. Kemerdekaan Hakim Keputusan Bebas Murni (Arti dan Makna). Jakarta: Simplex.

Rawls, John. 2006. Teori Keadilan, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Politik Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial Dalam Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suadi, H. Amran.Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Filsafat Pancasila, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Etika.Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group.

Sudarto. 1986. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung:Alumni.

Spohn, Cassia C. 2002. How Do Judges Decide?: The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment. California: Sage Publications Inc.

Tonry, Michael dan Richard S. Frase (Ed). 2001.Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries.New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Wrihatnolo, Randy R. dan Riant Nugroho Dwidjowijoto. 2007.Manajemen Pemberdayaan, Sebuah Pengantar dan Panduan Untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Yahya Harahap, M. 1997. Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hukum Online. 2019. Ketua MA Tekankan Pentingnya Konsistensi Putusan.https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5dc3059748942/ketua-ma-tekankan-pentingnya-konsistensi-putusan/. (20 Oktober 2020).

LegalMatch.History of Federal Sentencing Guidelines.https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/history-of-federal-sentencing-guidelines.html. (25 Oktober 2020).

University of Minnesota, Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2018. What Are Sentencing Guidelines?https://sentencing.umn.edu/content/what-are-sentencing-guidelines. (12 Oktober 2020).

Waruwu, Riki Perdana Raya. 2017.Penerapan Asas Fiksi Hukum Dalam Perma. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi (JDIH) Mahkamah Agung RI.https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/beranda/kegiatan/9-kegiatan/139-penerapan-asas-fiksi-hukum-dalam-perma. (10 Oktober 2020).

Wasby, Stephen L. 1979.Inconsistency in the United States Courts of Appeals: Dimensions and Mechanisms for Resolution. Vanderbilt Law Review.Volume 32.https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3038&context=vlr




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v15i4.1023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


____________________________________________
MEDIA BINA ILMIAH

ISSN 1978-3787 (print) | 2615-3505( online)
Published by BINA PATRIA | Email: laloemipa@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats