Henike Primawanti, Iin Endah Setyawati


The opportunities of globalization and the massive development of the information and communication technology sector, the limitations of the state in providing optimal welfare, and the desire of sub-state actors to optimize their resources have become the impetus for sub-state actors to carry out foreign relations as an effort to fulfill sub-national interests. One of the sub-state actors in Indonesia is Kuningan Regency. To obtain foreign sources and attract global attention, Kuningan Regency carried out its regional foreign policy by organizing the Tour de Linggarjati. This study aims to determine the application of the Kuningan Regency Government in using Tour de Linggarjati activities as an instrument for diplomacy to the global public. This study used the qualitative method, the data collected through interviews with several relevant sources and documentation studies. This study found that the Kuningan Regency Government made the Tour de Linggarjati activity to introduce its region to the global public. This activity has also benefited the community in Kuningan Regency. Therefore, explore the tourism industry in Kuningan Regency can be done in a series of Tour de Linggarjati activities.


Paradiplomacy, Sub-State, Kuningan Regency, Tour De Linggarjati, subnational interests

Full Text:



. Pemerintah Kabupaten Kuningan. (2016). Kuningan Mendunia Melalui Tour De Linggarjati 2016. Kuningankab.Go.Id. tour-de- linggarjati-2016

. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. In Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Minority Rights.

. Putra, Y. M. P. (2019). Tour de Linggarjati Dijarapkan Jadi Acara Kelas Dunia. Nasional.Republika.Co.Id.

. Susanti, R. (2015). Event Tour De Singkarak Sumatera Barat, Pemasaran dan Pariwisata yang Berkelanjutan. Menara Ekonomi.

. Belias, D., Kiriakou, D., Varsanis, K., & Trivellas, P. (2016). Athens 2004 Olympic Games aftermath : nation branding for tourism promotion success? 4th International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues (ICCMI), August, 223–229.

. Aryabaha, E. P. (2010). The Role of the Beijing Olympics in China’s Public Diplomacy and its Impact on Politics, Economics and Environment [The University of Malta].

. Adji, S. S. (2018). Olahraga sebagai Sarana Diplomasi Negara [Universitas Indonesia].

. Mazahir, I., Muammad, A. F., & Yaseen, S. (2020). Examining Sports / Cricket Diplomacy As A Tool To Instigate Political Interests : A Comparative Analysis Of Media Portrayal Of Cricketing Relations Between India and Pakistan. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(7), 6118–6160.

. Murray, S., & Pigman, G. A. (2014). Mapping the Relationship between International Sport and Diplomacy. Sport in Society, 17(9), 1098–1118.

. Kairupan, R. (2020). Olahraga dan Diplomasi Publik: Upaya Pemenuhan Kepentingan Politik dan Ekonomi Indonesia melalui Asian Games XVIII [Universitas Pelita Harapan].

. Pambudi, T. L. (2016). Peran Publik dalam Diplomasi: Penggunaan Diplomasi Basket dalam Hubungan Amerika Serikat-Cina. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 5(3), 111–125.

. Tiffany, A., & Azmi, F. (2020). Diplomasi Publik Indonesia melalui Penyelenggaraan Asian Games 2018. Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 202.

. Cevy, A. I., & Noorzaman, A. (2020). Peran Olahraga Sebagai Alat Diplomasi Penyelesaian Konflik di Semenanjung Korea Pada Tahun 2018. Independen, 1(1), 22–29.

. Karina, G., & Yuniasih, T. (2018). Diplomasi Olahraga Korea Selatan terhadap Korea Utara Kontribusi Olimpiade Musim Dingin 2018 bagi Harmonisasi Hubungan Bilateral. Jom.Fisip.Budiluhur.Ac.Id.

. Utomo, A. B. (2019). The Paradiplomatic Role of the ConIFA in Promoting Self-Determination of Marginalised Entities. Global Strategis, 13(1).

. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations. World Politics.

. Nye, J. S., & Keohane, R. O. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics. International Organization.

. Aguirre, K. M. N., & Bojórquez, G. C. (2018). Paradiplomacy and Economic Development in the Reynosa-McAllen cross-Border Region. Estudios Fronterizos, 19.

. Mincă, M. (2015). Types of International Cooperation at the Local Level Bucharest city hall case study. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXII(2(603), Summer), 237–246.

. Wolff, S. (2007). Paradiplomacy: Scope, Opportunities and Challenges. The SAIS Europe Journal of Global Affairs, 10.

. Kuznetsov, A. S. (2015). Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. Routledge.

. Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and States as Global Players. Oxford University Press.

. Duchacek, I. D. (2019). The territorial dimension of politics within, among, and across nations. In The Territorial Dimension of Politics: Within, among, and across Nations.

. Criekemans, D. (2010). Regional sub-state diplomacy today. In Regional Sub-State Diplomacy Today.

. Mukti, T. A. (2013). Paradiplomacy Kerjasama Luar Negeri Oleh Pemda Di Indonesia.

. Behnke, N., Broschek, J., Sonnicksen, J., & Keating, M. (2019). Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. In Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance.

. Komsary, K. C. (2015). Perkembangan Pariwisata Indonesia. Hotel-Management.Binus.Ac.Id.

. Idriasih, G. (2016). Diplomasi Indonesia Melalui Kampanye Wonderful Indonesia Dalam Meningkatkan Pariwisata Indonesia Di Dunia Internasional Tahun 2011-2015. JOM Fisip, 3(1), 5–48.

. UNWTO. (2017). The Year Ahead: Harnessing the Power of Tourism to Build a Better World. Www.Unwto.Org.

. Tampubolon, L. V. (2019). Peta Arah Kebijakan Pembangunan Ekonomi Inklusif 2020-2024. New.Smeru.or.Id.



  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1978-3787 (print) | 2615-3505( online)
Published by BINA PATRIA | Email:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats