KONSEP PEMERINTAHAN YANG ADAPTIF DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
Abstract
This article discusses the concept of adaptive future governance and its implications for public policy. This article was created using secondary data from literature studies. Adaptive governance is a concept of institutional theory related to the development of institutions that manage shared assets (especially public resources and various other forms of natural capital). The author argues that the idea of adaptive governance is valuable to economists because it can help understand the factors that together determine the adoption of potential policy solutions that we can design in the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., ... & Pimentel, D. (1996). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 1(1), 104-110.
Blanchet, K., Nam, S. L., Ramalingam, B., & Pozo-Martin, F. (2017). Governance and capacity to manage resilience of health systems: towards a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(8), 431.
Bowles, S., 2003, Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
Calogero, P. (2009). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Fieldwork. Berkeley Planning Journal, 22(1).
Downs, P. W., & Kondolf, G. M. (2002). Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management, 29(4), 477-496.
Gunderson, L. H. (2001). Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press.
Holling, C. S. (1986). Adaptive environmental management. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 28(9), 39-39.
Hornung, S. (2012). Beyond “New Scientific Management” Critical reflections on the epistemology of evidence-based management. In The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management.
Jiggins, J., & Röling, N. (2002). Adaptive management: potential and limitations for ecological governance of forests in a context of normative pluriformity. Adaptive Management: From theory to practice, 3, 93.
Larson, T., & Capra, C. M. (2009). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment and decision Making, 4(6), 467.
Nelson, R., Howden, M., & Smith, M. S. (2008). Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environmental science & policy, 11(7), 588-601.
Onyx, J. (2004). The Relationship between Social Capital and Sustainable Practices: Revisiting “The Commons”. Sustainability and Social Science: Round Table Proceedings, 41-57.
Ostrom, E, J. Walker and R. Gardner, 1992, ‘Covenants with and without a sword: Self- governance is possible’. American Political Science Review 86(2): 404-417
Ostrom, E., 2005, Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton
Qizilbash, M. (2007). Social choice and individual capabilities. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6(2), 169-192.
Ritchey, T. (2013). Wicked problems. Acta morphologica generalis, 2(1).
Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2003). Nodal governance, democracy, and the new ‘denizens’. Journal of law and society, 30(3), 400-419.
Sommers, T., & Rosenberg, A. (2003). Darwin's nihilistic idea: evolution and the meaninglessness of life. Biology and Philosophy, 18(5), 653-668.
Voss, J. P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v12i7.552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
____________________________________________
MEDIA BINA ILMIAH
ISSN 1978-3787 (print) | 2615-3505( online)
Published by BINA PATRIA | Email: laloemipa@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats