ANALISIS SISTEM PEMIDANAAN EDUKATIF SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA (STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI TABANAN)

Nurianto Rachmad Soepadmo

Abstract


This study aims to determine how the educational punishment system is as an alternative to diversion against children as perpetrators of criminal acts. This research was a normative empirical study by taking a case study at the Tabanan District Court. The object examined in this study was the criminal case of theft that occurred to children in the Tabanan District Court. In the case of criminal acts of theft committed by children in the Tabanan District Court as in the case Number 6 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2018 / PN Tab the judge faced problems in conducting diversions, namely related to the requirements for diversion as referred to in article 7 paragraph (2) of the Judicial System Law Child. Based on these facts, judges continue to make efforts to provide an educational criminal system against children by entrusting children to the Social Institution Development to provide an opportunity for children to become good people again through non-formal channels by involving community resources. This certainly seeks to provide justice to cases of children who have already committed criminal acts up to law enforcement officials. The educational system of punishment must be the priority of the judge in giving decisions against children who are in conflict with the law. In the Judge's decision, of course, it does not only pay attention to the facts of the trial in making the decision, but what is no less important is to consider the impact of punishment that will be received by children who are in conflict with the law in relation to the verdict.


Keywords


Children, Criminal Acts, Diversion & Educational Punishment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alkostar, A. (2011). Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif Urgensi dan Kritik. Epistema Institute dan HUMA.

Dwitamara, T. (2013). Pengaturan Dan Implementasi Mengenai Hak Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di Indonesia (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya dan Rumah Tahanan Medaeng). Perspektif, 18(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v18i2.118

Harahap, A. (2018). Sistem Peradilan Edukatif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia. De Lega Lata, 3(2), 217–229.

Marlina. (2009). Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. PT Refika Aditama.

Mohammad, H. N. . N. (2001). Proses Hukum Bagi Orang yang Didakwa Melakukan Kejahatan, dalam Hak Sipil dan Politik : Esai-Esai Pilihan. Elsam.

UU No. 11 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, (2012).

Purba, J. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana bermotif Ringan Dengan Restoratif Justice. Permata Aksara.

Qamar, N., Syarif, M., Busthami, D. S., Hidjaz, M. K., Aswari, A., Djanggih, H., &, & Rezah, F. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Sagala, A. W. . (2018). Kajian Yuridis Sistem Pemidanaan Edukatif Oleh Hakim Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (Studi. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 4(4), 51.

Sitindaon, E. R. (2012). Sistem Pemidanaan terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Sebelum dan Sesudah Pengaturan Restoratif Justice di Indonesia. The Ecumenical Review, 64(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-6623.2012.00163.x

Soedjono, D. (1984). Ruang Lingkup Kriminologi, Remadja Karya. Remadja Karya.

Soetodjo, W. (2008). Hukum Pidana Anak. PT Refika Aditama.

Wadong, M. H. (2000). Pengantar Advokasi dan Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Grasindo.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v15i6.904

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


____________________________________________
MEDIA BINA ILMIAH

ISSN 1978-3787 (print) | 2615-3505( online)
Published by BINA PATRIA | Email: laloemipa@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats